Cellar notes

AI mistakes in Bordeaux

The blog is a running set of annotated AI-answer cellar notes. Every two weeks I take one visibility failure and open it up: missing appellation, wrong producer type, borrowed rating, outdated visit claim, marketplace dependence, tourism omission, or artisan-producer misclassification. Each article ends with The Cellar Card: Bottle named, Shelf mistake, Dust line, and one Relabel sentence a business could publish.

noms-et-appellations

The Borrowed Score That Enters an AI Answer

How a wrong Parker or Decanter score enters AI answers for Bordeaux wines, and how producers can control cited ratings and vintage evidence.

fraicheur-et-identites

The Château That Reads as Winery or Hotel

Why AI reads a Bordeaux château with accommodation as only a winery or only a hotel, and how dual-identity wording keeps both offers clear.

noms-et-appellations

Why Big Bordeaux Labels Crowd Out Small Estates

Why AI recommends large Bordeaux labels and omits boutique estates, with proof signals small châteaux can use in petit château bordeaux recommandé searches.

noms-et-appellations

Why Growers and Négociants Get Swapped

How Bordeaux AI answers confuse château, grower-producer and négociant roles, and which entity-type wording keeps the commercial identity clear.

fraicheur-et-identites

The Vintage an English Buyer Still Sees

Why English buyer queries return wrong Bordeaux vintage availability, and how estate pages can publish stronger freshness signals.